Key result
Lifestyle counselling in high-risk 40-year-old men significantly reduced the cardiovascular disease risk score by a mean of 0.7 points over two years, with benefits observed across all educational groups.
Why the study?
Does lifestyle counselling improve cardiovascular disease risk scores and risk factors in high-risk middle-aged men across different socioeconomic statuses?
Cohort (n=200)
No
Does lifestyle counselling improve cardiovascular disease risk scores and risk factors in high-risk middle-aged men across different socioeconomic statuses?
Lifestyle counselling in high-risk middle-aged men improves overall cardiovascular risk scores and lifestyle behaviors across all socioeconomic groups, even when individual traditional risk factors show minimal change.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support lifestyle counselling in high-risk middle-aged men across education levels; leaves open causality and broader applicability pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: The inverse association between socioeconomic status and cardiovascular disease is well documented. We examined whether the impact of health counselling on cardiovascular risk factors in middle-aged men differed according to socioeconomic status. METHODS: We used data from a community based study assessing the risk for cardiovascular disease among middle-aged men in Helsinki, Finland. Traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors were measured and cardiovascular disease risk was assessed by a modified risk tool used in the North Karelia project (CVD Risk Score). Those men with increased risk for cardiovascular disease at their baseline visit in 2006 received lifestyle counselling. After two years these high-risk men were invited to a follow-up visit. The same measurements and risk assessments were repeated. RESULTS: Based on the CVD Risk Score there were significant differences between the groups at baseline (p = 0.001) and at follow-up (p<0.001) with the highest scores in the lowest educational group. There were no significant differences in traditional cardiovascular risk factors according to educational attainment between groups either at baseline or at follow-up. Baseline lifestyle characteristics differed between the groups regarding use of soft fat (p = 0.019). All groups responded positively to lifestyle counselling. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that lifestyle counselling is feasible in high-risk middle-aged men and lifestyle intervention works in all educational groups. Interestingly the traditional risk factors did not show improvement, but the risk score improved. From a practical point of view our findings stress the importance of using risk score calculators in health counselling instead of looking at individual cardiovascular disease risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sirén et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in High risk for cardiovascular disease (n=200). Lifestyle counselling vs. Baseline was evaluated on Change in CVD risk score (95% CI -1.0 to -0.5, p=<0.001). Lifestyle counselling in high-risk 40-year-old men significantly reduced the cardiovascular disease risk score by a mean of 0.7 points over two years, with benefits observed across all educational groups.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: