Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Universal notions of a right to health for unauthorized migrants operate together with incongruous state and international policies. These ambivalent policies demand ethnographic attention, since they have resulted in a two-tiered system in host countries and foster short-term, improvisational remedies. Medical care for unauthorized migrants is typically left in the hands of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and permitted under the guise of sympathy and generosity rather than anchored in policy. This paper draws upon ethnographic fieldwork in Germany to present the viewpoints of physicians engaged in medical humanitarianism and discuss the complications associated with filling access gaps through NGOs. It explores the range of motivations—political, religious, and humanitarian—that drive physicians to provide care to marginalized populations. In recent years, I argue that NGO demands upon the state have moved from requests to decriminalize medical aid to demands for compensation for the significant ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heide Castañeda (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: