Key result
Higher BIPASS scores linked to more binge eating and lower quality of life after bariatric surgery.
Why the study?
Standardized protocols for presurgical psychosocial assessment are lacking, and research examining the predictive utility of psychosocial evaluations for postsurgical outcomes is limited.
Does the BIPASS tool predict outcomes 1 and 2 years following bariatric surgery in patients referred for bariatric surgery?
Observational (n=200)
No
Does the BIPASS tool predict outcomes 1 and 2 years following bariatric surgery in patients referred for bariatric surgery?
The BIPASS tool can identify bariatric surgery patients at increased risk of problematic eating and poor health-related quality of life at 1 year postsurgery, though its predictive value diminishes by 2 years.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid preoperative risk stratification in bariatric patients; observational data leaves open long-term utility and requires prospective validation.
Bariatric surgery is the most effective intervention for severe obesity; however, many patients demonstrate insufficient and/or unsustained weight loss, and unsatisfactory psychosocial functioning in the longer-term. Although it is well established that attendance at postsurgical follow-up appointments is integral to sustained weight loss, nonadherence to follow-up is common. Consequently, presurgical psychosocial evaluations are conducted in order to identify patients at high risk of poor outcomes. Yet, no consensus has been established regarding a standardized protocol for the assessment of variables relevant to surgical outcomes, and bariatric programs vary widely in their interpretation of psychosocial risk. In addition, there is a paucity of research examining the predictive utility of psychosocial evaluations. The Bariatric Interprofessional Psychosocial Assessment of Suitability Scale (BIPASSTM), a novel psychosocial evaluation tool, was developed to address these issues. The purpose of the present study was to contribute to the validation of the BIPASS tool via two aims: 1) by examining the psychometric properties of the BIPASS, and; 2) by examining the ability of the BIPASS tool to predict outcomes 1 and 2 years following bariatric surgery, including weight loss and weight regain, quality of life, psychiatric symptoms, and adherence to postsurgical follow-up appointments. The BIPASS was applied retrospectively to the charts of 200 consecutively referred patients of the Toronto Western Hospital Bariatric Surgery Program (TWH-BSP). Factor analysis of BIPASS items revealed a two-factor structure, reflecting “Mental Health” and “Patient Readiness” subscales. Internal consistency for the BIPASS Total and subscale scores ranged from poor to good, and inter-rater reliability was excellent. Higher BIPASS scores significantly predicted higher binge eating symptomatology, and lower physical and mental health-related quality of life at 1 year postsurgery. The BIPASS did not predict any outcome variables at 2 years postsurgery, or adherence to postsurgical follow-up appointments. Findings suggest that the BIPASS can be used to identify patients at increased risk of problematic eating and poor health-related quality of life early in the postsurgical course, thereby facilitating appropriate interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Molly E. Atwood (2021) conducted an observational in Severe obesity (n=200). Bariatric Interprofessional Psychosocial Assessment of Suitability Scale (BIPASS) was evaluated on Weight loss and weight regain, quality of life, psychiatric symptoms, and adherence to postsurgical follow-up appointments at 1 and 2 years. Higher BIPASS scores significantly predicted higher binge eating symptomatology and lower physical and mental health-related quality of life at 1 year following bariatric surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: