Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Because computer-aided diagnoses can identify features that are not easily visible, their application in X-ray images of the chest is continuously increasing.However, most chest X-ray computer-aided diagnosis studies have been conducted using frontal projection,-such as posterior-anterior or anterior-posterior-radiographs, because other projections that might show otherwise obscured characteristic features are not widely accessible.Accordingly, we investigated the rib semantic segmentation in chest X-ray images projected frontally and obliquely.Materials and Methods: Chest X-rays were captured in frontal and oblique projections, and three UNet-based models were employed for efficient segmentation.Chest X-ray images may exhibit overlapping tissues, which can negatively affect the results.To overcome this issue, rib enhancement preprocessing was carried out, using a publicly available deep-learning rib suppression model.Results: The U2Net model was found to be the most effective model when working with oblique data, achieving a Dice coefficient of 0.89.Significantly outperforming the UNet and attention UNet, the U2Net P-values of 0.03, respectively. Conclusion:The difference in performance between oblique and frontal projections was hypothesized to be less pronounced than that between other projections.Despite employing a limited set of data with the frontal projection, we expected a significant performance improvement with the oblique projection.This hypothesis was confirmed, revealing a significant difference with P<0.05.Further research on different projections may serve as a foundation for offering more diversified information to radiologists and researchers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: