In this paper, we examine the applicability of spatial optimization as a generative modelling technique for sustainable land‐use allocation. Specifically, we test whether spatial optimization can be used to generate a number of compromise spatial alternatives that are both feasible and different from each other. We present a new spatial multiobjective optimization model, which encourages efficient utilization of urban space through infill development, compatibility of adjacent land uses, and defensible redevelopment. The model uses a density‐based design constraint developed by the authors. The constraint imposes a predefined level of consistent neighbourhood development to promote contiguity and compactness of urban areas. First, the model is tested on a hypothetical example. Further, we demonstrate a real‐world application of the model to land‐use planning in Chelan, a small environmental amenity town in the north‐central region of the State of Washington, USA. The results indicate that spatial optimization is a promising method for generating land‐use alternatives for further consideration in spatial decision‐making. Keywords: Multiobjective land‐use allocation modellingGenerative modellingSpatial optimizationSustainable land use Acknowledgements This material is partly supported by the National Science Foundation Directorate for Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences under Grant No. 0623482. The authors would also like to thank three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ligmann-Zielińska et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: