PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 11, 2014JAMA Surgery65 citations

Evaluation of Hospital Readmissions in Surgical Patients

View Full Paper
GSGreg D. SacksADAaron J. DawesMRMarcia M. Russell

Key Result

Administrative billing data differed from clinical diagnosis in 30.8% of surgical readmissions and identified only 4.8% as planned compared to 13.7% by clinical review.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=315)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does administrative claims data accurately identify the cause and planned status of hospital readmissions compared to clinical medical record review in general surgery patients?

P
Population
Consecutive patients discharged from general surgery services at a tertiary care, university-affiliated teaching hospital during 8 consecutive quarters (Q4 2009 through Q3 2011) with 315 hospital readmissions.
I
Intervention
Administrative claims data (readmission measure)
C
Comparator
Clinical medical record review
O
Outcome
Discordance rate between administrative and clinical diagnoses for all hospital readmissions, discrepancy between planned readmissions defined by the readmission measure and identified by clinical medical record review, and fraction of hospital readmissions unrelated to the original hospital stay

Administrative billing data is inaccurate for determining the reason and planned status of hospital readmissions, potentially leading to unwarranted financial penalties for hospitals.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has developed an all-cause readmission measure that uses administrative data to measure readmission rates and financially penalize hospitals with higher-than-expected readmission rates. OBJECTIVES: To examine the accuracy of administrative codes in determining the cause of readmission as determined by medical record review, to evaluate the readmission measure's ability to accurately identify a readmission as planned, and to document the frequency of readmissions for reasons clinically unrelated to the original hospital stay. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective review of all consecutive patients discharged from general surgery services at a tertiary care, university-affiliated teaching hospital during 8 consecutive quarters (quarter 4 October through December of 2009 through quarter 3 July through September of 2011). Clinical readmission diagnosis determined from direct medical record review was compared with the administrative diagnosis recorded in a claims database. The number of planned hospital readmissions defined by the readmission measure was compared with the number identified using clinical data. Readmissions unrelated to the original hospital stay were identified using clinical data. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Discordance rate between administrative and clinical diagnoses for all hospital readmissions, discrepancy between planned readmissions defined by the readmission measure and identified by clinical medical record review, and fraction of hospital readmissions unrelated to the original hospital stay. RESULTS: Of the 315 hospital readmissions, the readmission diagnosis listed in the administrative claims data differed from the clinical diagnosis in 97 readmissions (30.8%). The readmission measure identified 15 readmissions (4.8%) as planned, whereas clinical data identified 43 readmissions (13.7%) as planned. Unrelated readmissions comprised 70 of the 258 unplanned readmissions (27.1%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Administrative billing data, as used by the readmission measure, do not reliably describe the reason for readmission. The readmission measure accounts for less than half of the planned readmissions and does not account for the nearly one-third of readmissions unrelated to the original hospital stay. Implementation of this readmission measure may result in unwarranted financial penalties for hospitals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sacks et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Hospital readmissions in surgical patients (n=315). Administrative claims data vs. Clinical medical record review was evaluated on Discordance rate between administrative and clinical diagnoses for all hospital readmissions. Administrative billing data differed from clinical diagnosis in 30.8% of surgical readmissions and identified only 4.8% as planned compared to 13.7% by clinical review.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1832fcaeefdf6d9c137adchttps://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.18
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Are All Readmissions Bad Readmissions?2010 · 210 citations
  2. 2Incidence of potentially avoidable urgent readmissions and their relation to all-cause urgent readmissions2011 · 163 citations
  3. 3Outcomes and prediction of hospital readmission after intestinal surgery12004 · 163 citations
  4. 4Identifying Patient Preoperative Risk Factors and Postoperative Adverse Events in Administrative Databases: Results From The Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program2002 · 263 citations
  5. 5Assessing Surgical Quality Using Administrative and Clinical Data Sets: A Direct Comparison of the University HealthSystem Consortium Clinical Database and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data Set2009 · 125 citations