This article explores the centrality of humour in the performance and maintenance of a defensive masculine identity among a group of white, Irish, working-class boys in school. A series of extracts from the field demonstrate how that humour is deployed in versatile and creative ways in order to refuse and subvert a direct questioning of traditional, hegemonic masculinity in the classroom. In the specific context discussed here the boys are responding to a recent Irish educational initiative known as the Exploring Masculinities programme. This programme, through its presentation of ‘alternative’ masculine identities, offered an overt challenge to long-established and deeply felt understandings of what constitutes a ‘real man’. Analysis of the responses of the boys to the programme materials suggests not only the importance of humour as a defensive and supportive tool in the continuance of traditional hierarchies of maleness, but also the repressive nature of the boys’ compulsory ‘hard-man’ masculinity. Replete with misogynistic and homophobic references, this humour and its deployment shows a rigidly structured masculine identity, rooted in the past and heavily entrenched in their present.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cliona Barnes (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: