In this paper we investigate the tracking performance or two maximum-likelihood (ML)-oriented nondecision-aided (NDA) symbol synchronization algorithms, operating on a noisy M-PSK signal (M>2) transmitted over a time-varying nonselective Rician fading channel. The first algorithm is nonchannel-aided (CA): timing is acquired independently of the channel gain estimation. The second algorithm is channel-aided (CA): it makes use of (an estimate of) the instantaneous channel gain. As the channel gain estimator requires timing information, use of the CA algorithm implies that the timing and the channel gain must be acquired jointly. Both algorithms are suitable for fully digital implementation, and have a similar complexity. For E/sub 3//N/sub 0/ values of practical interest, we show that the NCA algorithm is to he preferred over the CA algorithm.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goethals et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: