Following Prasenjit Duara's strategy for “de-constructing China,” this article traces the development of several competing narratives of national unity and origin during the formative Republican era (1911-49) of Chinese history. Faced with the difficult task of incorporating the heterogeneous peoples of the Qing empire into the new Chinese nation-state, Han Chinese intellectuals looked backward into their own history for scientific proof of this unitary national imaginary. The article focuses on the tension between, on the one hand, a racial formulation that placed the source of Chinese unity in the “common origin” ( tongyuan) of its people and, on the other hand, a more subjective formulation that located this unity in the gradual, evolutionary “melding” ( ronghe) of several distinct cultures and races into a new national consciousness. In the process, it highlights the role played by social scientific discourses—as institutionalized in the disciplines of history, archaeology, and ethnology—in the construction of national identity in twentieth-century China.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James Leibold (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: