Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
H.264/Advanced Video Coding (AVC) employs classical bi-directional encoded (B) frames that depend only on intra-coded (I) and predictive encoded (P) frames. In contrast, H.264 Scalable Video Coding (SVC) employs hierarchical B frames that depend on other B frames. A fundamental question is how many priority levels single-layer H.264 video encodings require when the encoded frames are statistically multiplexed in transport networks. We conduct extensive simulation experiments with a modular statistical multiplexing structure to uncover the impact of priority levels for a wide range of multiplexing policies. For the bufferless statistical multiplexing of both H.264/AVC and SVC we find that prioritizing the frames according to the number of dependent frames can increase the number of supported streams up to approximately 8%. In contrast, for buffered statistical multiplexing with a relatively small buffer size, frame prioritization does generally not increase the number of supported streams.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Srinivasan et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: