Why the study?
Does the STAF score accurately identify atrial fibrillation in patients with ischemic stroke?
Observational
No
Does the STAF score accurately identify atrial fibrillation in patients with ischemic stroke?
The STAF score is a simple 4-item clinical tool that can identify atrial fibrillation in ischemic stroke patients with high sensitivity and specificity, aiding in secondary prevention.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support targeted AF screening post-stroke; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The high risk of recurrence and comorbidity after a stroke associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) justifies an aggressive diagnostic approach so that anticoagulant treatment can be initiated. METHODS: The clinical and paraclinical characteristics of consecutive ischemic stroke patients with and without documented AF were recorded. Independent predictive factors were then used to produce a predictive grading score for diagnosing AF, derived by logistic regression analysis: Score for the Targeting of Atrial Fibrillation (STAF). RESULTS: STAF, calculated from the sum of the points for the 4 items (possible total score 0 to 8): age >62 years (2 points); NIHSS > or =8 (1 point); left atrial dilatation (2 points); absence of symptomatic intraor extracranial stenosis > or =50%, or clinico-radiological lacunar syndrome (3 points). STAF > or =5 identified patients with AF with a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 88%. CONCLUSIONS: STAF can be used as part of a novel and simple strategy for the targeting of AF in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke. A multicenter study is now required to validate STAF in a larger number of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suissa et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Ischemic stroke. Score for the Targeting of Atrial Fibrillation (STAF) was evaluated on Diagnosis of atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: