Key result
Acute carotid baroreceptor stimulation reduced mean arterial pressure in young (77 to 64 mmHg, p<0.001) and old (76 to 64 mmHg, p<0.05) normotensive rats through age-dependent hemodynamic mechanisms.
Why the study?
Does acute unilateral field stimulation of carotid baroreceptors cause age-dependent vascular hemodynamic changes in normotensive rats?
Does acute unilateral field stimulation of carotid baroreceptors cause age-dependent vascular hemodynamic changes in normotensive rats?
Acute carotid baroreceptor stimulation reduces mean arterial pressure via different hemodynamic mechanisms depending on age, with reduced flow in young rats and reduced resistance in older rats.
Findings in normotensive rats should not guide therapy; hypothesis-generating for age-specific baroreflex mechanisms.
Carotid baroreceptor stimulation can treat resistant hypertension with possible effects on the vasculature beyond the decrease in arterial pressure. This study aims to characterize age-dependency of vascular hemodynamics changes with unilateral field stimulation of carotid baroreceptors in normotensive rats to infer underlying hemodynamic mechanisms. Anesthetized Wistar-Kyoto rats divided into two groups (young: n=10, 13-33 weeks; old: n=6, 52-58 weeks) were instrumented to measure heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP), and flow in the abdominal aorta and renal artery. Measures of aortic and renal artery stiffness and resistance were calculated. Baroreceptor stimulation caused a consistent reduction in MAP, HR, pulse pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity. In young rats reduced MAP (77 ± 10 to 64 ± 13 mmHg, p<;0.001) was concomitant with reduced mean aortic (40 ± 15 to 32 ± 11 ml/min, p<;0.05) and renal flow (3.0 ± 1.6 2.2 ± 1.1 ml/min, p<;0.001). However, in old rats reduced MAP (76 ± 14 to 64 ± 10 mmHg, p<;0.05) occurred with a reduced aortic resistance (1.8 ± 0.9 to 1.6 ± 0.9 mmHg.min/ml, p<;0.05), renal artery resistance (17.4 ± 2.4 to 16.5 ± 2.3 mmHg.min/ml, p<;0.05) and mean renal flow (4.5 ± 1.2 to 4.0 ± 1.1 ml/min, p<;0.05). This was consistent with reduced characteristic impedance in older rats in both the aorta (0.17 ± 0.08 to 0.13 ± 0.08 mmHg.min/ml, p<;0.05) and renal artery (4.97 ± 1.16 to 3.97 ± 1.08 mmHg.min/ml, p<;0.05). Stimulation caused a leftward shift in renal impedance phase frequency spectrum in both age groups indicating changes in wave reflection from the renal bed. Findings show that the reduction in MAP due to carotid barostimulation is associated with different hemodynamic mechanisms that depend on age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kouchaki et al. (2015) studied Normotensive (n=16). Unilateral field stimulation of carotid baroreceptors vs. Baseline was evaluated on Hemodynamic changes including mean arterial pressure. Acute carotid baroreceptor stimulation reduced mean arterial pressure in young (77 to 64 mmHg, p<0.001) and old (76 to 64 mmHg, p<0.05) normotensive rats through age-dependent hemodynamic mechanisms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: