We present a detailed analysis of the relations between acting, naming, and recognising objects from vision, touch, and verbal labels, in a series of three cases. We demonstrate that: (1) there can be better "use" than gesturing of objects even in a patient with impaired semantic information for the objects; (2) this is contingent on direct proprioceptive feedback in action; and (3) there are impaired gestures to "non-action" parts of objects even when the patients can gesture to names and can identify the objects. These results are consistent with a "convergent route" model of action, which holds that direct, modality-specific associations between objects and actions constrain the retrieval of actions from semantic representations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chainay et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: