Why do S undanese M uslims of W est J ava in certain situations prefer I slamic oratory in their regional language, S undanese, and in others prefer the national standard, I ndonesian? This article answers this question by firstly exploring different preaching outcomes that are recognised and generally accepted by S undanese M uslims. Some preaching events are oriented pre‐eminently to the communication of affect within the temporal frame of co‐presence. In others, preacher and audience unite around a transformative ethos. These outcomes bear contrasting implications for code selection. Where the first outcome is desired, preachers display multivocal, heterogeneous preaching styles in which the regional language offers functional benefits. In the second, Indonesian preachers and audiences respond to the national language's indexing of transformation. The social value of transformation is a situational factor for which Indonesian is the appropriate code. In this way, code selection signals the diversity of ways of being I slamic in the W est J avanese public sphere.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Julian Millie (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: