Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Representing shapes is a significant problem for vision systems that must recognize or classify objects. We derive a representation for a given shape by investigating its self-similarities, and constructing its shape axis (SA) and shape axis tree (SA-tree). We start with a shape, its boundary contour, and two different parameterizations for the contour. To measure its self-similarity we consider matching pairs of points (and their tangents) along the boundary contour, i.e., matching the two parameterizations. The matching, of self-similarity criteria may vary, e.g., co-circularity, parallelism, distance, region homogeneity. The loci of middle points of the pairing contour points are the shape axis and they can be grouped into a unique tree graph, the SA-tree. The shape axis for the co-circularity criteria is compared to the symmetry axis. An interpretation in terms of object parts is also presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: