Key result
Multiple long non-coding RNAs, notably MALAT1, are implicated in VTE pathogenesis but lack clear clinical utility.
Why the study?
While long non-coding RNAs may play a role in VTE pathogenesis, their clinical usefulness as biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets for VTE management remains unclear.
Long non-coding RNAs show potential as novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for venous thromboembolism, though further research is needed to clarify their clinical utility.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), a common condition in Western countries, is a cardiovascular disorder that arises due to haemostatic irregularities, which lead to thrombus generation inside veins. Even with successful treatment, the resulting disease spectrum of complications considerably affects the patient's quality of life, potentially leading to death. Cumulative data indicate that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) may have a role in VTE pathogenesis. However, the clinical usefulness of these RNAs as biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets for VTE management is yet unclear. Thus, this article reviewed the emerging evidence on lncRNAs associated with VTE and with the activity of the coagulation system, which has a central role in disease pathogenesis. Until now, ten lncRNAs have been implicated in VTE pathogenesis, among which MALAT1 is the one with more evidence. Meanwhile, five lncRNAs have been reported to affect the expression of TFPI2, an important anticoagulant protein, but none with a described role in VTE development. More investigation in this field is needed as lncRNAs may help dissect VTE pathways, aiding in disease prediction, prevention and treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marques et al. (2023) conducted a review in Venous thromboembolism (VTE). Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) was evaluated. Ten long non-coding RNAs, notably MALAT1, have been implicated in venous thromboembolism pathogenesis, though their clinical utility as biomarkers or therapeutic targets remains unclear.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: