The purpose of this study was to investigate speech-language pathologists’ perceptions of administrative support and non-support. Structured interview questions were used to elicit responses from 20 master’s level speech-language pathologists. Their perceptions of administrative support and non-support were divided into four primary areas: working conditions/resources, advocacy, staff development, and program assistance. Findings indicated that support has many dimensions, including provisions for adequate working conditions and resources, advocacy for the speech-language pathologist and the speech-language program, and facilitation of professional staff development. Implications for supervisors and administrators of speech-language pathologists’ perceptions of administrative support and non-support are suggested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schetz et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: