Key result
Multidisciplinary diagnostic algorithm for cryptogenic stroke and TIA linked to ~24% higher TTE rates.
Why the study?
Appropriate diagnosis and management of cryptogenic stroke and TIA is challenging and requires multidisciplinary involvement despite joint societal guidelines.
Does a standardized multidisciplinary diagnostic algorithm improve the rates of appropriate echocardiography and cardiac rhythm monitoring in patients with cryptogenic stroke or TIA?
Cohort (n=269)
No
Does a standardized multidisciplinary diagnostic algorithm improve the rates of appropriate echocardiography and cardiac rhythm monitoring in patients with cryptogenic stroke or TIA?
Implementation of a multidisciplinary diagnostic algorithm for cryptogenic stroke/TIA significantly increased the appropriate use of transthoracic echocardiography, agitated saline studies, and event monitoring.
Supports multidisciplinary algorithms to boost echocardiography in cryptogenic stroke; hypothesis-generating pending randomized outcome trials.
The appropriate diagnosis and management of cryptogenic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) is challenging and requires multidisciplinary involvement. Joint societal guidelines exist to guide the comprehensive evaluation of these entities. This study aimed to implement a standardized multidisciplinary diagnostic algorithm for cryptogenic stroke/TIA. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients admitted to the largest regional military healthcare center with stroke or TIA considered to be cryptogenic at the time of discharge. We abstracted baseline demographics and rates of extra- and intracranial imaging, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, and event monitor orders at the time of discharge. The incidence of event monitor results at 30 days and six months were included. A diagnostic algorithm for evaluation of cryptogenic stroke/TIA was created and disseminated hospital-wide using increased compliance with neuroimaging, echocardiography, and cardiac rhythm monitoring as primary endpoints for our intervention. Post-intervention data abstraction revealed similar rates of extra- and intracranial imaging, but significantly greater rates of transthoracic echocardiography (70% vs. 87%, p 0.0073), inclusion of agitated saline study (41% vs. 65%, p 0.0024), and event monitors ordered at discharge (18% vs. 35%, p 0.0045). At six months there was a higher rate of event monitors obtained (24% vs. 45%, p 0.001). Our study showed implementation of an evidence-based diagnostic algorithm for evaluation of cryptogenic stroke/TIA increases appropriate use of echocardiography and event monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hull et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack (n=269). Multidisciplinary diagnostic algorithm vs. Pre-intervention standard of care was evaluated on Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) performance rate (p=0.0073). Implementation of a multidisciplinary diagnostic algorithm for cryptogenic stroke and TIA significantly increased the rates of transthoracic echocardiography from 70% to 87%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: