Gender-based violence (GBV) remains a critical human rights issue, deeply rooted in gender inequality and affecting individuals globally. The current study evaluated the user experience of a gamified platform designed to raise awareness about GBV. Gamification, using game elements in non-game environments. has been proven to promote online and offline learning, but its effectiveness has yet to be tested in the case of sensitive educational material. We explored how the platform motivated and engaged users through two versions: individual and cooperative. Using the MEEGA360 scale for user experience and the Geneva Emotion Wheel for emotions, 40 users were randomly assigned to one of the versions. Results showed the platform was well-received, with users finding it enjoyable, user-friendly, and effective in facilitating discussions on GBV. Positive emotions like involvement, amusement, and interest were common, though negative emotions like irritation and anger also appeared. Despite these positive outcomes, the platform faced usability challenges and requests for more complex activities and detailed feedback. The cooperative version scored higher on social interaction but did not significantly outperform the individual version. Further research is needed to explore these differences and improve the platform’s effectiveness in GBV prevention. • The paper presents the user experience evaluation of a gamified platform, designed to raise awareness of gender-based violence on adolescents. We evaluated participants’ user experience, along with the emotions evoked during the use of the platform. • We compared two versions of the platform: one in the individual, and the other one in the cooperative game modality. • The results indicate that the platform is of good quality, and the gamification design does not overshadow the seriousness of the activities. Furthermore, the platform does not evoke strong negative emotions despite the sensitivity of the topic. • Contrary to our expectations and the literature on game modality, it seems that the individual modality might be more appropriate for the education of sensitive topics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gini et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: