Functional vascular assessment, including peripheral endothelial function, mental stress response, and sleep apnea evaluation, may provide better prognostic information in patients with acute coronary syndrome than traditional risk factors alone.
Does the assessment of functional risk factors improve the prediction of long-term adverse cardiovascular events in patients following acute coronary syndrome compared to traditional risk factors alone?
Endothelial dysfunction, assessed via peripheral tonometry, mental stress response, or sleep apnea, may serve as a unifying functional risk factor to better predict long-term cardiovascular events in post-ACS patients compared to traditional risk scores.
Over the years there has been considerable improvement in the clinical outcomes of patients treated for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Despite a significant reduction in acute mortality, a large percentage of patients post ACS continue to experience adverse cardiovascular (CV) events, with high long-term mortality rates and overall suboptimal medical management. Long-term risk prediction tools rely on traditional CV risk factors and are developed and validated in specific populations. Established CV risk factors, however, only explain half or fewer of CV events. These risk models may thus not be optimal in determining individual risk for long-term adverse outcomes or in helping to identify individual patients who do not respond to therapy. Identifying the specific plaque characteristics associated with increased likelihood for thrombotic complications and rapid progression has led to the concept of the vulnerable plaque. Recently, "vulnerable myocardium" (ie, myocardium that is prone to myocardial ischemia and fatal arrhythmia) has been shown to play an important role in outcome. Both vulnerable plaque and vulnerable myocardium are associated with functional vascular abnormalities, such as endothelial dysfunction, which are considered a key event in the initiation, progression and complications of coronary artery disease. Endothelial dysfunction may serve as an underlying unifying mechanism that would independently predict long-term outcome in patients with ACS undergoing revascularization.
Reriani et al. (Sun,) conducted a review in Acute Coronary Syndrome. Functional risk assessment vs. Traditional risk factors was evaluated. Functional vascular assessment, including peripheral endothelial function, mental stress response, and sleep apnea evaluation, may provide better prognostic information in patients with acute coronary syndrome than traditional risk factors alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: