Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bi-decade samples of dendrochronologically matched Irish Oak, measured with a precision of ca ± 20 years, covering the period 200 to 4000 BC are presented. The data are compared with the published data of Suess, de Jong, and Mook to provide a general calibration of the 14 C time scale for this period. Although the dendrochronologic sequences presented are not absolutely tied to present, the best fit (based on 14 C evidence) of the Belfast data to absolute chronologies, the error and evidence associated with such positioning is given. The intervals chosen for analysis were 20 years, reducing slightly the resolution of short-term variations when compared to 10-year intervals, which are sometimes measured. However, this calibration would suffice for most scientific purposes and certainly for the calendrical conversion of 14 C dates derived from archaeologic samples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pearson et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: