⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

September 13, 2010BMJ

The need to consider the wider agenda in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: breadth, timing, and depth of the evidence

John P. A. Ioannidis Fotini B. Karassa

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

As well as focusing on a precise question, systematic reviewers also need to consider the whole research programme for the interventions under study argue John Ioannidis and Fotini Karassa

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Ioannidis et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a18cddd673175fe754aed67 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c4875

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context:

1AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or bothNotes and Queries · Thu,
2Assessment and management of vulval painBMJ · Wed,
3Hard data, soft dataBMJ · Wed,
4Risk factors for mortality from imported falciparum malaria in the United Kingdom over 20 years: an observational studyBMJ · Tue,
5Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsBMJ · Mon,

More from BMJ

Clinical and cost effectiveness of mobile phone supported self monitoring of asthma: multicentre randomised controlled trialFri,
How the Taliban undermined community healthcare in Swat, PakistanWed,
Patient safety, satisfaction, and quality of hospital care: cross sectional surveys of nurses and patients in 12 countries in Europe and the United StatesTue,
Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic reviewThu,
Association between low functional health literacy and mortality in older adults: longitudinal cohort studyThu,