Purpose: Problem-posing, an important component for developing mathematical thinking, is of great interest in integrating into classroom practice. Preservice and in-service teachers are expected to carry out high-quality problem-posing activities, and it is thought that non-routine problem-posing may be a good way to achieve this. In this context, this study focuses on non-routine problem-posing and aims to determine the characteristics of the problems that prospective mathematics teachers have posed. Research Methods: The study was carried out with 43 middle school prospective mathematics teachers in an elective course on problem-solving and problem-solving strategies. To analyse the data, descriptive analysis was carried out on the problems posed by prospective teachers. All problems were analysed according to the five criteria; problem type, contextuality, originality, complexity, and strategy. Findings: It has been determined that almost all of the problems have a single answer, include a context, have a low or medium level of complexity, and contain different problem-solving strategies. Although prospective teachers were asked to pose their own problems, almost half of them had posed similar, traditional problems. Implications for Research and Practice: These results show that prospective teachers can pose non-routine problems. Although this study provides some meaningful results, it is clear that it has limitations that require further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ülger et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: