Key result
Exenatide infusion during cardiopulmonary bypass shows no benefit over placebo for major events.
Why the study?
GLP-1 agonists reduce risk and injury in cardiovascular diseases, but their efficacy in cardiopulmonary bypass-assisted cardiac surgery is unknown.
Does exenatide infusion reduce the risk of death, stroke, renal failure, or new/worsening heart failure in adult patients undergoing elective CABG or aortic valve replacement?
RCT (n=1,389)
Double-blind
2-by-2 factorial
No
Does exenatide infusion reduce the risk of death, stroke, renal failure, or new/worsening heart failure in adult patients undergoing elective CABG or aortic valve replacement?
Exenatide infusion during cardiopulmonary bypass does not reduce the long-term risk of major adverse clinical events in patients undergoing elective CABG or aortic valve replacement.
Exenatide during bypass should not be used; confirms neutral effect on long-term major adverse events in elective cardiac surgery.
BACKGROUND: GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) agonists have been proven beneficial in reducing the risk of and injury associated with several cardiovascular diseases. The efficacy in cardiopulmonary bypass-assisted cardiac surgery is unknown. This trial aimed to investigate the efficacy of an infusion of the GLP-1 agonist exenatide during and after open-heart surgery in reducing the risk of death and major organ failure. METHODS: Randomized, double-blinded, 2-by-2 factorial design, single-center clinical trial, also including liberal (FiO 2 of 100%) or restrictive (FiO 2 of 50%) oxygenation during and after bypass. The present article presents the results of the exenatide intervention. We included adult patients undergoing elective cardiopulmonary bypass-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic valve replacement. Patients were predominantly low risk. The intervention was an infusion of 17.4 µg of exenatide or placebo during cardiopulmonary bypass and the first hour after weaning thereof. The main outcome was time to a composite end point consisting of death, stroke, renal failure requiring dialysis, or new/worsening heart failure during follow-up. Secondary end points included occurrence of prespecified adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 1389 patients were included in the analyses. Within a follow-up period of a median of 5.9 years (min–max; 2.5–8.3 years), 170 (24%) patients in the exenatide group and 165 (24%) patients experienced a primary end point. We found no difference in time to the first event between patients randomized to FiO 2 50% versus FiO 2 100% (hazard ratio, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.83–1.3]; P =0.80). We found no significant difference in rates of adverse events between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Exenatide during cardiopulmonary bypass and weaning thereof did not significantly reduce the incidence of death, stroke, renal failure, or new/worsening heart failure in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02673931.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kjærgaard et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Elective cardiopulmonary bypass-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic valve replacement (n=1,389). Exenatide vs. Placebo was evaluated on Time to a composite end point consisting of death, stroke, renal failure requiring dialysis, or new/worsening heart failure. Exenatide infusion during cardiopulmonary bypass did not significantly reduce the composite of death, stroke, renal failure, or heart failure compared to placebo (24% vs 24%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: