Methodological review reveals critical inferential limitations in sibling fixed effects designs, indicating researchers must evaluate sources of within-family variation.
Recent studies use sibling fixed effects to estimate the influence of the family environment on children, a practice we call the "discordant family design" (DFD). These studies suffer from a disconnect between the use of within-family variation, on the one hand, and relevant theories which mostly refer to variation between families on the other. In addition, reverse causality, within-family confounding, selection into identification, and measurement error complicate their interpretation further. We discuss three applied examples—the effects of parenting, family income, and neighborhood context—and provide some general guidance. To avoid misinterpretation, researchers should have a strong grasp of the variance that enters into estimation, and not just the potential confounders a given strategy is designed to deal with.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Engzell et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: