Key result
The presence of residual shunt after PFO closure was associated with an increased incidence of recurrent stroke or TIA compared with complete closure.
Why the study?
Residual shunt occurs in up to 25% of patients after PFO closure, but its long-term influence on stroke recurrence is unknown.
Does the presence of residual shunt after PFO closure increase the risk of recurrent stroke or TIA in patients with PFO-attributable cryptogenic stroke?
Cohort (n=1,078)
No
Does the presence of residual shunt after PFO closure increase the risk of recurrent stroke or TIA in patients with PFO-attributable cryptogenic stroke?
The presence of a residual shunt, particularly a moderate or large one, after PFO closure is associated with a significantly increased long-term risk of recurrent stroke or TIA.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Residual shunt after PFO closure may signal higher recurrent stroke/TIA risk; hypothesis-generating for optimized closure techniques in prospective trials.
Background: Residual shunt is observed in up to 25% of patients after patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure, but its long-term influence on stroke recurrence currently is unknown. Objective: To investigate the association of residual shunt after PFO closure with the incidence of recurrent stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). Design: Prospective cohort study comparing stroke or TIA recurrence in patients with and without residual shunt after PFO closure. Setting: Single hospital center. Participants: 1078 consecutive patients (mean age, 49.3 years) with PFO-attributable cryptogenic stroke who were undergoing percutaneous PFO closure were followed for up to 11 years. Measurements: Residual shunt was evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography with saline contrast. Primary outcome was a composite of the first recurrent ischemic stroke or TIA after PFO closure. Results: Compared with complete closure, the presence of residual shunt after PFO closure was associated with an increased incidence of recurrent stroke or TIA: 2.32 versus 0.75 events per 100 patient-years (hazard ratio [HR], 3.05 [95% CI, 1.65 to 5.62]; P < 0.001). This result remained robust after adjustment for important covariates, namely age; study period; device; presence of atrial septal aneurysm, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, hypercoagulability, or hypermobile septum; and medication use (HR, 3.01 [CI, 1.59 to 5.69]; P < 0.001). Further stratification based on shunt size revealed that moderate or large residual shunts were associated with a higher risk for stroke or TIA recurrence (HR, 4.50 [CI, 2.20 to 9.20]; P < 0.001); the result for small residual shunts was indeterminate (HR, 2.02 [CI, 0.87 to 4.69]; P = 0.102). Limitation: Nonrandomized study with potential unmeasured confounding. Conclusion: Among patients undergoing PFO closure to prevent future stroke, the presence of residual shunt, particularly a moderate or large residual shunt, was associated with an increased risk for stroke or TIA recurrence. Primary Funding Source: National Institutes of Health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in PFO-attributable cryptogenic stroke (n=1,078). Residual shunt vs. Complete closure was evaluated on Composite of the first recurrent ischemic stroke or TIA after PFO closure (HR 3.05, 95% CI 1.65 to 5.62, p=< 0.001). The presence of residual shunt after PFO closure was associated with an increased incidence of recurrent stroke or TIA compared with complete closure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: