Key result
Visually guided laser balloon ablation significantly reduced the recurrence of atrial arrhythmias at 12 months compared to radiofrequency ablation (12% vs. 36%, P=0.047).
Why the study?
Following findings that acute pulmonary vein reconnection during adenosine provocation was lower after visually guided laser balloon ablation than radiofrequency ablation, the long-term recurrence rates and prognostic significance of adenosine testing remained to be evaluated.
Does visually guided laser balloon ablation compared to radiofrequency ablation reduce atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=50)
1:1
Does visually guided laser balloon ablation compared to radiofrequency ablation reduce atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Visually guided laser balloon ablation significantly reduces atrial arrhythmia recurrence at 12 months compared to radiofrequency ablation, and a negative adenosine provocation test post-VGLB has a 100% negative predictive value for recurrence.
Visually guided laser balloon ablation may be preferred to radiofrequency for paroxysmal AF; extends options for achieving durable pulmonary vein isolation.
BACKGROUND: We recently demonstrated that the acute reconnection rate detected with adenosine provocation test (APT) was significantly lower after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with visually guided laser balloon ablation (VGLB) than with RF ablation (RF). We evaluated the recurrence rate of atrial arrhythmias at 12 months after VGLB vs. RF and the significance of APT results for the outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty patients with paroxysmal AF were randomized to either RF or VGLB ablation in a 1 : 1 fashion. After PVI each PV underwent an APT. All patients underwent a 3-day Holter and clinical follow-up every 3 months. Significantly less PVs reconnected during APT in the VGLB-arm (10 PV (10.8%) vs. 29 PV (30.9%); P=0.001). Significantly less patients had a recurrence of atrial arrhythmia in the VGLB-arm (3 vs. 9; P=0.047). In the VGLB-arm no recurrence was seen in those patients with a negative APT (negative predictive value (NPV)=100%). Only 3 of the 8 patients with a positive APT in the VGLB-arm had a recurrence (positive PV (PPV)=37%). Recurrences in the RF-arm were seen in 3 patients with positive APT as well as in 6 patients with negative APT (PPV=18% and NPV=33%). CONCLUSIONS: There was significantly less recurrence of atrial arrhythmias at 12 months after PVI with VGLB. A negative APT after PVI with VGBL predicted freedom from AF with a very high NPV meaning that the high acute efficiency of the VGLB persisted long term.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Üçer et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=50). Visually guided laser balloon ablation (VGLB) vs. Radiofrequency ablation (RF) was evaluated on Recurrence of atrial arrhythmias at 12 months (p=0.047). Visually guided laser balloon ablation significantly reduced the recurrence of atrial arrhythmias at 12 months compared to radiofrequency ablation (12% vs. 36%, P=0.047).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: