• The bCFS paradigm alone cannot isolate unconscious processing. • We introduced rev-bCFS paradigm to measure and control conscious effects in visual awareness. • Face-Inversion effect was larger in bCFS as compared to rev-bCFS. • Top-down attention affected only conscious processing in rev-bCFS. • Combining bCFS and rev-bCFS can disentangle conscious/unconscious effects in visual awareness. Breaking continuous flash suppression (bCFS) is a widely used experimental paradigm that exploits detection tasks to measure the time an invisible stimulus requires to access awareness. One unresolved issue is whether differences in detection times reflect unconscious or conscious processing. To answer this question, here we introduce a novel approach (reverse-bCFS [rev-bCFS]) that measures the time an initially visible stimulus requires to be suppressed from awareness. Results from two experiments using face stimuli indicate that rev-bCFS can capture conscious effects, which indicates that contrasting standard bCFS with rev-bCFS can isolate unconscious processing occurring specifically during bCFS. For example, while face inversion impacted both bCFS and rev-bCFS, effects were larger in bCFS, suggesting a distinct contribution of unconscious processing to the advantage of upright over inverted faces in accessing awareness. Combining standard bCFS and rev-bCFS may offer a fruitful approach to disentangle conscious and unconscious effects occurring during interocular suppression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ciorli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: