PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2014Proceedings of meetings on acoustics103 citationsOpen Access

Best practices in measuring vowel merger

JNJennifer NyczLHLauren Hall‐Lew

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Vowel mergers are some of the most well-studied sound change phenomena. Yet the methods for assessing and characterizing an individual speaker's participation in an ongoing merger (or split) vary widely, especially among researchers analyzing naturalistic corpora. We consider four methodological approaches to representing and assessing vowel difference: Euclidean distances, mixed effects regression modeling (Nycz 2013), the Pillai-Bartlett trace (Hay, Warren, COT and CAUGHT among Canadians in the New York City region; and TRAP and BATH among Scots who work in Southern England. We conclude with some practical recommendations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nycz et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1909ebeeb3b193604f6fe3https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4894063
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper