Key result
Nurse-led thrombolysis was favored over nurse-initiated thrombolysis by surveyed Irish nurses, with 91% willing to undertake the former compared to 74% for the latter.
Why the study?
What are the attitudes and perceptions of Irish nurses and doctors towards nurse-led and nurse-initiated thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction?
Cross-Sectional (n=103)
What are the attitudes and perceptions of Irish nurses and doctors towards nurse-led and nurse-initiated thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction?
Irish nurses and doctors view nurse-led thrombolysis favorably, with nurses showing higher agreement and greater willingness for nurse-led (91%) versus nurse-initiated (74%) approaches.
Nurse attitudes favor nurse-led thrombolysis in Ireland; hypothesis-generating for prospective studies on treatment delays and outcomes.
UNLABELLED: Nurse-led and nurse-initiated thrombolysis are strategies utilised within the United Kingdom to reduce delays for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) requiring thrombolytic therapy. Both strategies have been found to reduce delays significantly. A Reduction in the delays experienced by patients can increase an individual's long-term survival rate. To date, there appears to be no documented research pertaining to nurse-led and nurse-initiated thrombolysis within the Irish arena. AIM: To investigate if the attitudes and perceptions of nurses and doctors are positive to nurse-led and nurse-initiated thrombolysis. METHODS: A quantitative approach employing a comparative descriptive survey design was utilised. A convenience sample of 75 nurses and 28 doctors was obtained. FINDINGS: Highlighted that nurse-led and nurse-initiated thrombolysis are potential roles for coronary care nurses. There was a significant difference of opinion between the two professional groups regarding this initiative, with nurses having higher levels of agreement. Nurses were more willing to undertake nurse-led thrombolysis (91%) as compared to nurse-initiated (74%), with years of experience and education appearing to influence this decision. CONCLUSION: It is suggested nurse-led thrombolysis is the more favourable role to Irish nurses and doctors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ursula Chaney (2004) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute myocardial infarction (survey of healthcare professionals) (n=103). Nurse-led thrombolysis vs. Nurse-initiated thrombolysis was evaluated on Willingness to undertake the thrombolysis role. Nurse-led thrombolysis was favored over nurse-initiated thrombolysis by surveyed Irish nurses, with 91% willing to undertake the former compared to 74% for the latter.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: