Radiofrequency catheter ablation has evolved into an indispensable therapeutic tool for the management of various cardiac arrhythmias, replacing older surgical and pacing techniques.
May inform ablation preference in WPW; leaves open prospective trials for broader use.
The development of non-pharmacological approaches for controlling cardiac arrhy- thmias reflects the many limitations of longterm antiarrhythmic drug therapy. These include poor patient compliance, frequent treatment failures or side effects or both, and a small but definite risk of life-threatening toxicity or proarrhythmia. Antiarrhythmic surgery has proved highly effective in many arrhythmias but it is expensive, causes con- siderable discomfort, and is associated with a definite incidence of morbidity and mortality. Curative ablation of arrhythmia substrates by catheter-based techniques avoids many of these problems and is far more acceptable to patients and physicians. In 1982, Gallagher and Scheinman separately described success- ful closed chest ablation of the atrioventricular junction by transcatheter delivery of high energy unmodified DC shocks to the His bundle region for the treatment of patients with drug-refractory supraventricular arrhyth- mias."2This comparatively crude approach committed the patient to a permanent pace- maker and was associated with significant risk of barotrauma, but nevertheless its advent marked the beginning of a new era of inter- ventional electrophysiology. Since 1982 improvements in catheter design, power sources, and mapping techniques have trans- formed catheter ablation from an investigational procedure into an indispensable therapeutic tool that has supplanted surgery and antitachycardia pacing in the manage- ment of the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and junctional tachycardias and is also being applied with increasing success to various other arrhythmias including atrial flutter, ectopic atrial tachycardia, and some cases of ventricular tachycardia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bashir et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: