Why the study?
Does management in a dedicated coronary care unit improve survival or the success of electric shock for ventricular fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Does management in a dedicated coronary care unit improve survival or the success of electric shock for ventricular fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
The creation of a dedicated coronary care unit did not significantly change the success rate of electric shock for ventricular fibrillation, while concurrent left ventricular failure markedly reduced survival.
Summary Analysis of electrocardiograms tape-recorded from patients admitted to hospital with acute myocardial infarction revealed that the pattern of ventricular extrasystolic activity was not significantly different among those who subsequently developed ventricular fibrillation and those who did not. Episodes of ventricular fibrillation occurred predominantly within 4 hours from the start of infarction. Patients were 3 times less likely to survive an episode of ventricular fibrillation if they also had left ventricular failure than if this feature was absent. Management of episodes of ventricular fibrillation was compared in patients before and after the creation of a specially staffed and equipped coronary care unit. The success of electric shock as a treatment for ventricular fibrillation was similar before and after the creation of the coronary care unit. An attempt was made to determine which features in the management of ventricular fibrillation in this and in previously published series were associated with patient survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
B. J. Northover (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Methods of Information in Medicine