Since 2005, political polling and the application of polls-based candidacy have been enormously influential and, in fact, have become vital for local leader elections (Pilkada ( ( ), particularly in Indonesia's districts and municipalities.The Golkar Party's declaration that it was moving to polls-based candidacy created a domino effect, inducing other major political parties-such as the National Mandate Party (Partai Amanat Nasional, PAN), the Democratic Party (Partai Demokrat, PD), and the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (Partai Demokrasi Indonesia Perjuangan, PDIP)-to follow Golkar's approach to contesting local constituencies.As polling becomes a new device for reforming the political recruitment process, political polling exercises have also unintendedly transformed into a means for waging a power struggle.Political actors have exploited polling as a tool for gaining a political vehicle, as a map for soliciting bribes, as a map for guiding the mobilization of votes, and as a means for inviting an indirect bandwagon effect.In short, political polling has moved beyond acting as a tracker of voters' preferences to become a popular political device.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agus Trihartono (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: