Why are some networks degree-degree correlated (assortative), while most of the real-world ones are anticorrelated (disassortative)? Here, we prove, by combinatorial methods, that the assortativity of a network depends only on three structural factors: transitivity (clustering coefficient), intermodular connectivity, and branching. Then, a network is assortative if the contributions of the first two factors are larger than that of the third. Highly branched networks are likely to be disassortative.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ernesto Estrada (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: