Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study considered the premise that subcellular particles in leaves contribute to the reflectance (R) and absorptance (A) of near‐infrared (IR) (light 750 to 350 nm). Subcellular particles of spinach ( Spinacia oleracea L.) leaves were differentially sedimented and resuspended in a buffered sucrose solution. A spectroreflectometer was used to measure R and transmittance (T) over the 500‐ to 2,500‐nm wavelength interval (WLI) on replicated aliquots of five preparations: buffered sucrose solution (control); chloroplast preparation; S1, sediment of chloroplast preparation supernatant; $2, sediment of S1 supernatant; and S3, sediment of S2 supernatant. Absorptance was calculated: A= 1 ‐ (R + T). All suspensions of particulates caused less R than the buffered sucrose solution over the 500‐ to 650‐nm WLI. The chloroplast preparation, compared with the buffered sucrose solution, increased R over the 750‐ to 950‐nm WLI. The chloroplast preparation, compared with the buffered sucrose solution, S2, and S3, decreased T over the 500‐ to 1,250‐nm WLI; SI decreased T over the 500‐ to 900‐ nm WLI. Compared with remaining treatments, the chloroplast preparation increased A over the 500‐ to 1,100‐nm WLI. Excluding the buffered sucrose solution, R and A increased and T decreased in the IR region as particle size increased. A conclusion was reached that subcellular particles in leaves contribute to the R and A of IR light.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
H. W. Gausman (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: