What does this research mean for the field?

Transitioning to multicounty extension agent positions introduces specific adjustment challenges and stresses for staff accustomed to traditional single-county roles. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.INCREMENTAL. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

What question did this study set out to answer?

This study aims to examine the adjustments and challenges faced by multicounty agents in Ohio.

May 29, 2026Open Access

Stresses of Multicounty Agent Positions

Key Points

This study aims to examine the adjustments and challenges faced by multicounty agents in Ohio.
Survey conducted among 23 multicounty agents about their experiences and adjustments.
Analysis of responses to identify common concerns and challenges faced by the agents.
Agents expressed frustrations with adapting to new roles and responsibilities.
The study highlighted the need for additional support and training for agents in multicounty positions.
Responses indicated a mix of challenges related to financial pressures and the demand for specialization.

Abstract

Financial concerns, early retirements, and a need for specialization have forced Ohio and other states to look at new staffing patterns.Traditionally, each county has had three agents, one each in agriculture, home economics, and 4-H, with one of the agents taking the community resource development function.This pattern changed on November 1, 1987, when the first agent was appointed to a multicounty position.Since then, until February 1989, when this study was conducted, 22 other agents have taken on this tradition-breaking responsibility.New ways of doing things can cause frustrations and other concerns.A multicounty agent, along with the staff development office, conducted a study of these 23 agents asking how they were adjusting to their new positions.Their responses, along with a look at what others have found out about staffing patterns for local Extension program units, is the focus of this article.

AIに質問

Bookmark

View Full Paper