Key result
Intrapartum cardiotocography reaches ~50% use in low-risk pregnancies with minimal guideline deviation.
Why the study?
Knowledge was limited regarding the extent of intrapartum cardiotocography use in low-risk pregnancies and whether practice aligns with international and Danish national guidelines.
What is the extent of intrapartum cardiotocography use in low-risk pregnancies and does it align with guidelines?
Cross-Sectional (n=411)
No
What is the extent of intrapartum cardiotocography use in low-risk pregnancies and does it align with guidelines?
Approximately half of women with low-risk pregnancies receive intrapartum cardiotocography, generally aligning with guidelines, though deviations often relate to epidural analgesia.
Supports guideline-concordant CTG use in low-risk labor; leaves open whether epidural indications merit expanded criteria or stricter oversight.
Background There is limited knowledge about the extent of intrapartum cardiotocography use in low-risk pregnancies and whether practice aligns with international and Danish national guidelines. Aim To describe the use and the initial indications of intrapartum cardiotocography in low-risk pregnancies. Furthermore, to investigate whether practice of intrapartum fetal monitoring aligns with international and Danish national guidelines. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among 411 women with low-risk pregnancies at a single hospital in Denmark. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records covering the period 1st January 2023 to 31st December 2023. Descriptive statistics were performed. Findings A total of 204 (49.6%) women with low-risk pregnancies were monitored with cardiotocography during labour. The most frequent initial indications for cardiotocography application were: fetal heart rate abnormalities ( n = 71, 34.8%), epidural analgesia administration ( n = 66, 32.4%), and meconium-stained amniotic fluid ( n = 34, 16.7%). In total, 35 cases (8.5%) did not align with the international guidelines, with the majority ( n = 23, 65.7%) receiving less extensive cardiotocography than recommended. In comparison, 57 cases (13.9%) did not align with the Danish national guidelines; among these, most women ( n = 54, 94.7%) received more extensive cardiotocography monitoring than recommended. Conclusion Approximately half of women with low-risk pregnancies were monitored with cardiotocography during labour. In general, intrapartum fetal monitoring practices in low-risk pregnancies showed minimal deviation from international and Danish national guidelines. Most of non-compliant cases were associated with epidural analgesia administration, highlighting an area that warrants increased attention in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Madsen et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Low-risk pregnancies (n=411). Intrapartum cardiotocography was evaluated on Use of intrapartum cardiotocography. Intrapartum cardiotocography was used in 49.6% of low-risk pregnancies during labour, showing minimal deviation from international (8.5%) and Danish national (13.9%) guidelines.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare