Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper, I examine the structural positions in two different types of networks and their relationship to trust. I propose two types of trust: particularistic which is trust in specific other individuals and general trust in colleagues and the organization as a whole. The findings suggest that both centrality in the friendship network and the go-between position in advice networks are related to particularistic trust towards the other individuals in the networks. Particularistic trust, in turn, is associated with the two kinds of general trust. I introduce the Chinese concept of pao to explain the Chinese dynamic of trust formation in interpersonal networks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jar‐Der Luo (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: