Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
National cross-sectional survey finds high emotional burnout rates in oncology clinicians, suggesting urgent need for organizational interventions.
9014 Background: International reports suggest a high prevalence of burnout in oncology, but contemporary Russian data are limited. Methods: Anonymous online survey (June 7-14, 2025) of oncology clinicians and trainees assessing emotional exhaustion in the prior 4 weeks, related symptoms, coping strategies, and free-text views on drivers/mitigation. Results: 735 respondents participated (medical oncologists 46.0%, surgical oncologists 23.9%, radiation oncologists 11.6%, trainees 9.0%); 78.5% worked in public hospitals and 69.0% had no managerial role. Emotional exhaustion was reported "often" by 326 (44.4%) and "constantly" by 152 (20.7%); 157 (21.4%) reported episodic exhaustion, 74 (10.1%) rare, and 26 (3.5%) none. Patient detachment was reported sometimes by 291 (39.6%), often by 221 (30.1%), and as near-constant disengagement by 42 (5.7%). Frequent thoughts about leaving clinical work were reported by 275 (37.4%) (additional 243, 33.1% only in exceptionally difficult moments). Excessive workload was perceived often/constantly by 458 (62.3%); lack of time for breaks/recovery by 629 (85.6%) at least sometimes. Common coping strategies included sleep/rest by 592 (80.5%), support from close ones by 437 (59.5%), physical activity by 385 (52.4%), and hobbies by 251 (34.1%); 198 (26.9%) reported alcohol/medications. In free-text drivers (n=569), the most cited themes were leadership/management issues (33.7%), time/workload pressure (21.1%), patient/relative conflict and complaints (19.3%), and paperwork (12.5%); proposed mitigation included protected rest/work-life boundaries (26.3%) and workload reduction/staffing/process optimization (20.8%). Conclusions: Two-thirds of respondents reported frequent/constant emotional exhaustion, accompanied by patient detachment and high intent to leave clinical work. Findings support prioritizing organization-level interventions and protected recovery time alongside accessible support resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Danilova et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: