Demonstrates improved displacement reconstruction in offshore wind turbines, suggesting enhanced structural safety.
Accurate Structural Health Monitoring of offshore wind turbines is critical for ensuring their long-term operational safety in harsh marine environments. Although displacement is a fundamental metric for assessing structural deformation and stress distribution, its direct measurement in open-ocean conditions is severely hindered by environmental interference and the absence of stable spatial references. Consequently, reconstructing displacement from structural acceleration through double integration is widely adopted, yet it suffers from severe baseline drift. Furthermore, existing drift-mitigation techniques often rely on empirical parameter selection and are limited to single-point reconstructions, failing to capture the full three-dimensional (3D) spatial attitude of the structure. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a novel 3D spatial attitude reconstruction framework based on advanced drift removal and spatial interpolation. First, an improved drift removal algorithm is developed to accurately eliminate baseline errors from acceleration signals, ensuring the physical fidelity of the reconstructed local displacements. Subsequently, cubic spline interpolation is utilized to extrapolate these discrete local measurements into a comprehensive full-field attitude profile of the entire turbine structure. The performance and robustness of the proposed method are systematically verified through numerical simulations and finite element analysis. Finally, its engineering applicability and accuracy are further validated via laboratory experiments and field measurements. The proposed framework effectively mitigates noise sensitivity and significantly enhances the accuracy of full-field attitude reconstruction, providing a reliable foundation for refined structural health assessments of OWTs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ran et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: