Evaluates non-fermented red ginseng's impact on growth and health in pigs, suggesting optimal dietary levels.
This study evaluates the effects of non-fermented red ginseng marc (RGM) in a commercial liquid feeding system on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profiles, fecal short-chain fatty acids, and pork quality in growing-finishing pigs. A total of 480 crossbred pigs ([Yorkshire × Landrace] × Duroc) with an average body weight of 32.64 ± 0.12 kg were used in a 12-week feeding trial. Experimental pigs were allotted to one of four treatments in a randomized complete block design (RCBD), with three replicate pens per treatment and 40 pigs per pen based on body weight and sex. Dietary red ginseng marc (0, 2%, 3%, 6%) was added to each experimental diet via a liquid feeding system. Final body weight decreased linearly with increasing dietary RGM (p < 0.05). Average daily gain during weeks 10–12 showed both linear and quadratic responses (p < 0.05), and overall average daily gain during weeks 0–12 decreased linearly (p < 0.05). Average daily feed intake decreased linearly during weeks 4–6, 7–9, 10–12, and overall (p < 0.05). During weeks 7–9, fecal acetate and butyrate increased linearly (p < 0.05), whereas during weeks 10–12, acetate, propionate, butyrate, and total SCFA were reduced at the highest inclusion level. Blood urea nitrogen decreased linearly at measured points (p < 0.05). Glucose increased linearly at weeks 9 and 12 (p < 0.05), and total cholesterol decreased linearly at week 12 (p < 0.05). Under the present commercial liquid feeding conditions, supplemental non-fermented RGM at 2% or 3% of the basal diet could be considered practical inclusion levels, whereas 6% inclusion reduced feed intake and growth performance during the finishing period (weeks 7–12).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: