Randomized trial shows ctDNA positivity predicts recurrence risk in early-stage NSCLC, indicating its utility in prognosis.
8031 Background: Curative-intent surgery for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is followed by relapse in approximately 20–30% of patients. We previously reported interim results of the prospective MUSETALK-Lung01 study (multiomics sequencing technique application kick-start), showing that pre-operative, ctDNA positivity predicted increased relapse risk. Here we present the final analysis of the full cohort and incorporate pathological risk factors to conduct a more comprehensive prognostic evaluation for early-stage NSCLC. Methods: The MUSETALK-Lung01 study is a prospective, longitudinal, observational study designed to evaluate the clinical utility of a tumor-naïve ctDNA assay in patients with early-stage NSCLC. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was extracted, and subjected to CanCatch Surf test as described previously. The assay algorithm reports both the ctDNA detection status (positive/negative) and the estimated ctDNA levels. Longitudinal data, including vital status, treatment, relapse, and survival status, were collected over 5 years. The study was approved by the institutional review board or ethics committee at each site, with all participants providing written informed consent. Results: The complete cohort of MUSETALK-Lung01 consisted of 455 early-stage NSCLC patients, among whom the median follow-up time was 63 months, with a 2-year recurrence rate of 7.0% and a presurgical ctDNA positivity rate of 6.4%. To identify clinical and biological factors associated with survival, both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Presurgical ctDNA positivity was strongly associated with inferior recurrence outcomes (χ 2 p < 1 x 10 -9 ), indicating that tumor burden can be prognostic beyond clinical stage and pathological conditions. Specifically, among clinical stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients, ctDNA detection demonstrated robust prognostic stratification for recurrence risk (2-year RFS: 60% [95% CI: 40%–91%] vs. 96% [95% CI: 94%–98%]; log-rank p < 1 x 10 -7 ). Similar prognostic value of ctDNA was observed in stage II-IIIA LUAD patients, albeit with reduced discriminative power (log-rank p < 0.01). After incorporating pathological information, the performance of prognostic stratification was further improved. Conclusions: By evaluating ctDNA abundance, we provide highly sensitive and specific prognostic assessments and risk stratification for early-stage NSCLC patients. The non-invasive, nature of this test enables precision peri-operative management and selection of patients who may benefit from innovative treatments, with the potential to improve survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: