Examines wind retrieval uncertainty related to rainfall in tropical cyclones, indicating the importance of accurate SAR measurements.
The radial structure and azimuthal asymmetry of tropical cyclone (TC) eyewall winds are critical for intensity change and wind-related hazards, yet they remain difficult to characterize using conventional observations. Using multi-platform C-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) wind fields and collocated Stepped Frequency Microwave Radiometer (SFMR) wind speed and rain-rate observations, this study examined TC inner-core structure, eyewall asymmetry, and rainfall-dependent wind retrieval uncertainty for 51 TCs and 130 SAR scenes. The TC inner-core structure was characterized using a best-track-constrained center refinement and quality control procedure, in which the storm center was refined from the minimum of a Gaussian-smoothed SAR wind field and scenes were screened by eye/annulus sampling, eye–eyewall contrast, and annular wind organization. Of the 130 SAR scenes, 53 were retained for refined-center evaluation, and the 32 QC-passed scenes were used for the primary storm-centered structural analysis. The RMW showed a weak tendency to decrease with an increasing SAR-derived maximum azimuthal-mean wind speed, and the normalized wavenumber-1 asymmetry at the RMW decreased in stronger storms. Under strict temporal collocation (Δt≤30 min), the SAR–SFMR comparison achieved an RMSE of 4.22 m s−1, a bias of −1.61 m s−1, R2 = 0.82, and a regression slope of 0.90. Rainfall-related SAR–SFMR mismatch was most evident around the eyewall and adjacent outer-eyewall region, indicating the need to consider center uncertainty, scene suitability, temporal collocation, and rain-sensitive retrieval effects when interpreting SAR-derived TC inner-core structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: