Abstract This article employs a traditional comparative law concept, the numerus clausus principle, to assess the state of land law in Africa using Tanzania as a case study. The numerus clausus principle is observed in both civil law and common law systems, either expressly in national legislation or implicitly in patterns of land rights enforcement. Under the principle, the legal system fixes and limits the number of interests in land that may be created, conveyed, and enforced, and market participants lack the autonomy to modify the characteristics of these interests when engaging in land transactions. The numerus clausus principle provides a tool for measuring and evaluating land law regimes: To what extent do African land law systems reflect the numerus clausus principle? How does the law balance the standardization benefits of the principle with the need to accommodate diverse customary land tenure systems? An analysis of the land law regime in Tanzania reveals challenges in balancing the specification and enforcement of formal property rights with administrative discretion and customary land governance. The analysis highlights the distinction between doctrinal adherence to the numerus clausus principle and its practical implementation, suggesting that future land law reforms in Africa must consider not only the formal legal rules that constrain property rights creation but also how administrative practices and legal pluralism shape land rights in practice.
David L. Finnegan (2026) studied this question.