Retrospective cohort study identifies germline RAD51 variants and links them to distinct tumor features in breast cancer.
572 Background: RAD51 paralogs (RAD51C, RAD51D, XRCC2) and RAD50 are crucial in DNA repair. Germline pathogenic variants (PVs) increase hereditary breast/ovarian cancer risk, but domain-specific impacts remain unclear. Methods: Retrospective cohort study (2019-2025) of breast cancer patients undergoing multigene testing. PVs were mapped to functional domains. Tumor features included histology, stage, grade, TILs, and molecular subtype. Associations were assessed using Fisher’s exact test. Results: Among 495 patients, 23 (4.6%) had RAD51 family PVs (RAD51C = 16, RAD51D = 4, RAD50 = 1, XRCC2 = 1). Median diagnosis age was 49. Synchronous malignancies were significantly more frequent in RAD51 carriers vs. BRCA1 carriers (34.8% vs.; OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.09–11.26). Most variants (22/23) were truncating (11 nonsense, 9 frameshift, 1 splice-site, 1 exon deletion). Domain mapping revealed disruption of critical regions: RAD51-like core domain truncations (RAD51D p.Arg186 ; RAD51C p.Arg193 ), RAD51C C-terminal truncations removing essential regions for complex integrity, and early RAD50 truncation predicted to abolish MRN complex function. Tumors were predominantly early-stage (65.2% stage I). Histology showed invasive carcinoma of no special type (69%) and invasive lobular carcinoma (25%), with strong enrichment of lobular histology in RAD51C carriers (p < 0.001). RAD51C tumors were basal-like or luminal A, while the RAD50 tumor was luminal B HER2-positive. RAD51C tumors often had high nuclear grade (77.3%) but low TILs (71%). Conclusions: RAD51 family PVs are primarily truncating, disrupting key HRR domains and supporting loss-of-function as the main mechanism. Domain location correlates with distinct clinicopathological features, refining genotype–phenotype correlations for improved risk assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cicilini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: