This article compares Lacanian and Freudian perspectives on depression, suggesting clinical implications for understanding its complexities.
This article compares two perspectives on depression: the modern psychiatric paradigm, which conceives of depression as an episodic nosographic entity with neurobiological underpinnings, sometimes accompanied by psychotic symptoms; and the Lacanian psychoanalytic framework, which understands depression as an affect secondary to a specific psychic structure and to the subject's relation to the Real. In Freud's work, depression may be endogenous (melancholia) or related to grief, whereas in Lacan's theory it may arise within any psychic structure (neurotic, perverse, or psychotic) and reflects a subjective renunciation of knowledge, carrying a fundamental ethical dimension. The paper discusses the clinical implications of Lacanian perspective: it is crucial to assess the possible presence of an underlying psychotic structure beyond the depressive affect, in order to prevent potential harm for the patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michele Ribolsi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: