Examines prostate cancer incidence and treatment disparities in G20 countries, highlighting implications for healthcare systems.
5032 Background: Prostate cancer is the leading male malignancy in G20 nations, yet cross-national disparities in detection, treatment, and outcomes remain insufficiently characterized. This study examines incidence, mortality, and treatment patterns across G20 countries, with attention to socioeconomic and health system factors. Methods: We analyzed prostate cancer incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) in all 20 G20 member states from 1990 to 2023 using GBD 2023 data. Analysis focused on men aged ≥50 years. Age-standardized rates were calculated, and incidence-to-mortality ratios were used as a proxy for early detection and treatment access. Radical treatment rates (surgery, radiotherapy) and PSA screening availability were correlated with survival patterns. Country-level economic estimates included diagnostic, therapeutic, and end-of-life expenditures. Results: In 2023, G20 countries reported 3.24 million new prostate cancer cases and 512,000 deaths, resulting in 11.8 million DALYs. Age-standardized incidence rates ranged from 23.4 to 112.6 per 100,000 men—a 4.8-fold variation—strongly associated with national healthcare development index (r = 0.78, p < 0.001). High-income G20 nations reported incidence-to-mortality ratios between 4.2:1 and 5.8:1, while middle-income countries such as India, Indonesia, and Mexico ranged from 1.3:1 to 1.8:1. India and Indonesia together accounted for 24% of G20 prostate cancer deaths despite contributing only 18% of total incident cases. Radical treatment rates spanned from 8% in India to 68% in the USA, correlating with long-term survival trends. Average healthcare expenditure per prostate cancer death ranged from $2,100 in low-resource settings to $89,400 in high-income countries. Within high-income nations, men in the lowest socioeconomic quintile experienced 2.1 times higher mortality than those in the highest quintile. Conclusions: Marked disparities in prostate cancer burden and treatment access persist across G20 nations, shaped by income level and healthcare system capacity. Strategic expansion of PSA-based screening and curative treatment in middle-income settings could substantially reduce preventable deaths and narrow the outcome gap.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magnani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: