Evaluates TRACP-5b levels as markers for bone metastasis progression in NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib.
Background/Aim: Bone metastases (BMs) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are associated with skeletal-related events that impair quality of life. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b) is considered a marker of osteoclastic activity; however, its prognostic utility for NSCLC patients with BMs remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between longitudinal changes in TRACP-5b and BM progression in a relatively homogeneous population of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC treated with osimertinib. Patients and Methods: Patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC receiving osimertinib between January 2019 and May 2024 were retrospectively identified. Serum TRACP-5b levels were measured at five predefined time points: osimertinib initiation (Point 1), the first computed tomography scan for response evaluation (Point 2), the two assessments immediately preceding disease progression (Points 3 and 4), and the time of progression (Point 5). Patients were classified by BM progression status and matched 1:1 on prior denosumab administration and EGFR mutation type to reduce baseline imbalance. Mixed-effects models for repeated measures were used to assess longitudinal differences in TRACP-5b levels, adjusting for relevant covariates. Results: Thirty-six patients (18 per group) were included. Least-squares mean TRACP-5b levels were generally comparable between groups from Points 2 to 4, whereas higher levels were observed at Point 5 in the BM progression group (difference, 49.4 mU/dl; 95%CI=3.0-95.7). TRACP-5b levels increased from Points 3 to 5 only in the BM progression group. Conclusion: Serial monitoring of TRACP-5b may provide supplementary information for detecting BM progression in patients with NSCLC treated with osimertinib.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikegami et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: