Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Randomized trial compares fuzuloparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone to standard treatment, showing improved outcomes in patients with a specific genetic status.
5008 Background: The combination of PARP inhibitors with standard AA-P may offer enhanced antitumor activity over AA-P. We conducted FUZUPRO, an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, to compare the efficacy of fuzuloparib, a novel PARP inhibitor, plus AA-P vs AA-P as 1L treatment for mCRPC. Methods: 1L mCRPC patients were randomized (1:1) to orally receive fuzuloparib 150 mg BID plus AA-P (abiraterone acetate 1000 mg QD; prednisone 5 mg BID) or placebo plus AA-P. Randomization was stratified by DNA-repair gene defect (DRD) status (positive vs negative/unknown) and other factors. Primary endpoint was blinded independent central review (BICR)-assessed radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) per RECIST v1.1 and PCWG3. As of March 23, 2025, 259 (85% of total expected) BICR-assessed rPFS events occurred, and a prespecified interim analysis was conducted. Results: 496 patients were randomized to fuzuloparib-AA-P (n = 249) or AA-P (n = 247). Median follow-up was 33.3 mo. Fuzuloparib-AA-P significantly prolonged rPFS compared with AA-P (median, 24.8 mo vs 19.9 mo; HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55-0.91; 1-sided p = 0.0034). rPFS benefit with fuzuloparib-AA-P was generally consistent across clinically relevant subgroups. Among DRD-positive patients (n = 116), median rPFS was 27.7 mo and 13.9 mo in the fuzuloparib-AA-P and AA-P groups, respectively (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.85; 1-sided p = 0.0039). Subgroup analysis suggested improved rPFS among DRD-positive patients regardless of their BRCA1/2 mutation status. Among DRD-negative/unknown patients (n = 380), median rPFS was 22.8 and 21.2 mo, respectively. Overall survival showed a benefit trend in favor of fuzuloparib-AA-P (Table). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported by 81.9% and 76.0% of patients in the two groups, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs were mainly hematological toxicities, including anemia (20.1%), decreased white blood cell count (5.6%), decreased platelet count, and decreased neutrophil count (5.2% for each). Conclusions: Fuzuloparib plus AA-P as 1L treatment significantly prolonged rPFS in patients with mCRPC. The combination showed acceptable safety and tolerability with no new safety signals identified. Clinical trial information: NCT04691804 . Overall DRD-positive DRD-negative/unknown Fuzuloparib-AA-P(N = 249) AA-P (N = 247) Fuzuloparib-AA-P (N = 60) AA-P (N = 56) Fuzuloparib-AA-P (N = 189) AA-P (N = 191) rPFS, mo, median (95% CI) 24.8 (20.4, 30.4) 19.9 (15.2, 22.2) 27.7 (17.7, NR) 13.9 (8.3, 24.9) 22.8 (19.9, 30.2) 21.2 (16.5, 24.6) HR (95% CI), vs. AA-P 0.71 (0.55, 0.91) 0.51 (0.31, 0.85) 0.81 (0.61, 1.08) Overall survival, mo, median (95% CI) 41.9 (31.1, NR) 36.8 (28.7, NR) NR (27.0, NR) 36.8 (24.7, 40.3) 37.3 (29.0, NR) 36.8 (28.7, NR) HR (95% CI), vs. AA-P 0.96 (0.73, 1.24) 0.76 (0.44, 1.32) 1.00 (0.74, 1.35) NR, not reached.
Ye et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: