Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Proof-of-concept study validates biodistribution and dosimetry of Tb-161 PSMA-617 in mCRPC, suggesting its potential use.
Background: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with suboptimal response to 177 Lu PSMA-617. Terbium-161 (Tb-161), with its emission of β-particles and high-LET Auger/conversion electrons, offers potential advantages in targeting micrometastases. However, clinical validation, especially in resource-limited settings, remains limited. Materials and Methods: This single-center, proof-of-concept study was conducted at the Department of Nuclear Medicine, FMRI, Gurgaon. Manual in-house radiolabeling of Tb-161 with PSMA-617 was performed. The samples were withdrawn for quality control analyses. Five mCRPC patients were administered Tb-161 PSMA-617. Post-therapy planar and single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging was conducted to assess biodistribution and dosimetric analysis. Results: Radiolabeling Tb-161 with PSMA-617 was more than 95% efficient with 55 min of heating at 95°C. The radiochemical purity was >98% for all the runs ( n = 5). The sample was found to be sterile with no gel formation seen after 15 d for all the batches. Post-therapy imaging demonstrated favorable biodistribution and high tumor uptake. Dosimetric analysis revealed absorbed doses comparable or superior to historical 177 Lu-PSMA-617 data. No acute adverse events or safety concerns were observed post administration. Conclusions: This study successfully demonstrates the feasibility of manual in-house synthesis and clinical application of Tb-161 PSMA-617 in an Indian tertiary care setting. The favorable synthesis, imaging, biodistribution, and dosimetric profile support its potential as a next-generation theranostic agent for mCRPC. These findings warrant further validation through larger, controlled clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thakral et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: